The Pillars of Determining Information Credibility

Authors

  • Aisha Adhamjonovna Ro‘yiddinova PhD Candidate at the Academy of Public Policy and Governance under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Keywords:

reliable information, public opinion, fact-checking, media literacy, information security, institutional mechanisms, digital communication

Abstract

This article analyses the issues of determining the credibility of information in the contemporary digital information environment. It examines the importance of reliable information in the context of the growth of global information flows, the popularisation of social networks, and the widespread dissemination of such phenomena as disinformation, misinformation and malinformation in shaping public opinion. In the course of the study, theoretical approaches to assessing the credibility of information are examined, and on the basis of international experience and fact-checking practices, five pillars of information verification are proposed. These are: assessing the credibility of the source, cross-checking through independent sources, verification of visual content, distinguishing fact from opinion, and verification of statistical and empirical data. The findings of the research contribute to strengthening the role of reliable information in shaping public opinion, ensuring information security, and improving the effectiveness of institutional communication.

References

[1] N. Newman, A. R. Arguedas, C. T. Robertson, R. K. Nielsen, and R. Fletcher, Digital News Report 2025. Oxford, U.K.: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, 2025.

[2] Edelman, “2025 Edelman Trust Barometer: Global Report,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.edelman.com/trust/2025-trust-barometer

[3] Stevenson University Library, “Evaluating Information Sources,” Stevenson University, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://library.stevenson.edu

[4] Harvard College Writing Program, “Harvard Guide to Using Sources,” Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://guides.library.harvard.edu/using-sources

[5] J. Habermas, Legitimation Crisis. Boston, MA, USA: Beacon Press, 1973.

[6] C. Wardle and H. Derakhshan, Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe, 2017.

[7] International Fact-Checking Network, “Code of Principles.” [Online]. Available: https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/

[8] Journalism University, “The Essential Good Practices of News Reporting: Cross-checking Facts and Figures: The Discipline of Truth.” [Online]. Available: https://journalism.university

[9] P. Kovach and T. Rosenstiel, The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: Crown Publishing, 2021.

[10] UNESCO, Journalism, ‘Fake News’ and Disinformation: A Handbook for Journalism Education and Training. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2018.

[11] J. Potter, Media Literacy, 10th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2022.

[12] S. J. A. Ward, Ethics and the Media: An Introduction. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

[13] M. Metzger and A. Flanagin, “Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics,” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 59, pp. 210–220, 2013.

[14] A. J. Flanagin and M. J. Metzger, Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2008.

[15] R. Hobbs, Digital and Media Literacy: Connecting Culture and Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-13