Social Significance of Civic Culture
Keywords:
Personal civic culture, theoretical model, civic consciousness, civic activity, civic responsibility, social activism, patriotism, social significanceAbstract
The article discusses the structural elements and important aspects of the theoretical model of individual civil culture. In particular, since the reforms being implemented intensively towards the establishment of a New Uzbekistan are aimed at the interests of the people, citizen activity plays an important and decisive role on this path. After all, citizen activity is the main criterion for building a civil society. From the perspective of this relevance, the article presents the introduction of individual civil culture into scientific circulation, the components of its theoretical model, namely, the components of civic consciousness and civic activity, in turn, are composed of certain internal elements. Ultimately, the theoretical model of individual civil culture and its social significance are interpreted as a product of the mutual harmony of civic consciousness and civic activity. The extremely important and significant functions of individual civil culture for building a people-oriented state and a free civil society are revealed on the basis of philosophical and historical methods.
References
[1] Sh. M. Mirziyoyev, Yangi O‘zbekiston taraqqiyot strategiyasi asosida demokratik islohotlar yo‘lini qat’iy davom ettiramiz. Speech at the joint session of the Oliy Majlis chambers during the inauguration ceremony of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Xalq So‘zi, Nov. 7, 2021.
[2] O. V. Omelichkin, “Grazhdanskaya kul’tura: sposoby interpretatsii,” Vestnik Zabaykalskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, no. 6, pp. 77–82, 2016.
[3] C. E. Merriam, Civic Training in the United States. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
[4] G. Almond and S. Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1963.
[5] S. Keeter, C. Zukin, M. Andolina, and K. Jenkins, The Civic and Political Health of a Nation: A Generational Portrait. College Park, MD, USA: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), 2002. Available: ResearchGate.
[6] T. A. Sadchikova, “Soderzhanie ponyatiya grazhdanskoy otvetstvennosti lichnosti, kriterii i pokazateli ee sformirovannosti,” Vestnik Tambovskogo Universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye Nauki, no. 6, pp. 180–185, 2009.
[7] “Milliy g‘oya,” Qomus.info. Available: https://qomus.info
[8] I. A. Karimov, Milliy mafkura – davlatimiz va jamiyatimiz qurilishida biz uchun ruhiy-ma’naviy kuch-quvvat manbai, in Ozod va Obod Vatan, Erkin va Farovon Hayot – Pirovard Maqsadimiz, vol. 8. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: O‘zbekiston, 2000.
[9] “Razvitost institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva i sredstv massovoy informatsii v Germanii,” CyberLeninka, 2004. Available: https://cyberleninka.ru
[10] “Stanovlenie partsipatornoy politicheskoy kul’tury v Germanii,” Infopedia. Available: https://infopedia.su
[11] “Economic growth: Country classification,” Nonews Country Data. Available: https://nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/gdp-temp
[12] P. V. Levshun, “Istochniki finansovoy pomoshchi dlya razvitiya ekonomiki afrikanskikh stran,” Problemy Ekonomiki i Yuridicheskoy Praktiki, no. 3, pp. 192–196, 2011.
[13] R. D. Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 1993.
[14] R. D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY, USA: Simon & Schuster, 2000.
[15] J. Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1989.
