Comparative Study of the Concept of Time in English and Uzbek Languages Based on Corpus Analysis

Authors

  • Ergashova Kamola Ikromovna Asia international university

Keywords:

Corpus analysis,, time concept, temporal category, comparative linguistics, English language, Uzbek language, grammatical tense, aspect, lexical representation, typology

Abstract

Time is a key category in human cognition and language, expressed through grammatical, lexical, and discourse means. Although it is a universal concept, its linguistic realization differs across languages due to structural and typological features. This article presents a corpus-based comparative analysis of time representation in English and Uzbek using authentic corpus data. The study examines temporal meanings expressed through grammatical constructions, collocations, and lexical units. The findings show that English primarily encodes time through tense–aspect forms and prepositional structures, whereas Uzbek relies on morphological markers, reduplication, and lexical integration. The research identifies both common features and structural differences in the temporal modeling of the two languages.

References

[1] N. B. Ataboyev, Mediamatnlar Diaxronik Korpusida Til Rivojlanishining Empirik Tahlil Tamoillari. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, pp. 19–22.

[2] R. Rasulov, Umumiy Tilshunoslik. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Oliy Ta’lim Muassasalari Uchun Darslik, 2012.

[3] L. S. Vygotsky, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press, 1978.

[4] R. S. Shakirov, “Korpus lingvistikasi va parallel korpuslar xususida,” Innovative Development in Educational Activities, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 173–176, 2023.

[5] W. N. Francis and H. Kucera, Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin, 1983.

[6] K. Malmkjaer, The Linguistics Encyclopedia, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2002.

[7] [7] D. Biber, S. Conrad, and R. Reppen, Corps Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

[8] J. Sinclair, “Corpus and text: Basic principles,” in Developing Linguistic Corpora: A Guide to Good Practice. Tuscan Word Centre, 2004.

[9] W. N. Francis and H. Kucera, Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence, RI, USA: Brown University Press, 1967.

[10] Mark Davies, “British National Corpus,” Available: https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/

[11] Uzbek National Corpus, “Vaqt lemma search results,” Available: https://uzbekcorpus.uz/

[12] G. Leech, Principles of Pragmatics. London, U.K.: Longman, 1983.

[13] G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 2003.

[14] P. Baker, Corpus Linguistics and Discourse Analysis. London, U.K.: Continuum, 2006.

[15] T. McEnery and A. Hardie, Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-13

How to Cite

Ergashova Kamola Ikromovna. (2026). Comparative Study of the Concept of Time in English and Uzbek Languages Based on Corpus Analysis. Web of Semantic: Universal Journal on Innovative Education, 5(1), 51–54. Retrieved from https://journal.univerpublishing.org/index.php/semantic/article/view/3333