Congenital Anomalies in Newborns: Public Health Challenges and Prevention

Authors

  • Djalilova Gulnoza Abdulhamidovna Namangan Branch of the Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Maternal and Child Health
  • Shaira Khalilovna Atadjanova Department of the Faculty of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Andijan State Institute

Keywords:

Congenital anomalies, newborn health, prenatal screening, maternal risk factors, public health, Uzbekistan, neonatal mortality, prevention

Abstract

Congenital anomalies remain a significant contributor to neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. These structural or functional defects present at birth may result from genetic, environmental, nutritional, or infectious factors. In Uzbekistan, demographic growth, improvements in maternal health services and expanded prenatal screening programs have increased attention to early detection and prevention of birth defects. This paper examines the epidemiological trends, risk factors, and preventive strategies for congenital anomalies in newborns, with emphasis on national healthcare initiatives, prenatal diagnostics, and maternal education. Strengthening perinatal care systems and community awareness is essential for reducing long-term disability and improving neonatal outcomes.

References

1. World Health Organization. (2023). Congenital anomalies. Geneva: WHO.

2. Christianson, A., Howson, C. P., & Modell, B. (2006). March of Dimes Global Report on Birth Defects. White Plains, NY.

3. Brent, R. L. (2004). Environmental causes of human congenital malformations. Pediatric Annals, 33(4), 205–214.

4. Sadler, T. W. (2012). Langman’s Medical Embryology (12th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

5. Czeizel, A. E., & Dudás, I. (1992). Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. New England Journal of Medicine, 327(26), 1832–1835.

6. Salomon, L. J., Alfirevic, Z., Berghella, V., et al. (2011). Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 37(1), 116–126.

7. Neu, N., Duchon, J., & Zachariah, P. (2015). TORCH infections. Clinics in Perinatology, 42(1), 77–103.

8. Barr, R. G. (2020). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 58(3), 487–503.

9. Vrijheid, M., Dolk, H., Stone, D., et al. (2011). Environmental risk factors for congenital anomalies. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119(5), 598–606.

10. Boyle, B., Addor, M. C., Arriola, L., et al. (2018). Estimating global burden of congenital anomalies. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 103(8), 789–794.

11. Dolk, H., Loane, M., & Garne, E. (2010). Congenital heart defects in Europe. Circulation, 121(7), 841–849.

12. Bahadirovich, R. B. (2026). Emotional Capital Loss and Educational Vulnerability in Transnational Families. Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 51, 106-112.

13. March of Dimes. (2020). Birth Defects Data and Statistics.

14. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2022). Maternal and Newborn Health Coverage.

15. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Maternal and Child Health Program Reports.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

Abdulhamidovna, D. G., & Atadjanova, S. K. (2026). Congenital Anomalies in Newborns: Public Health Challenges and Prevention. Scholastic: Journal of Natural and Medical Education, 5(1), 25–29. Retrieved from https://journal.univerpublishing.org/index.php/scholastic/article/view/3376