Ideological-Artistic Content and Compositional Characteristics of the Work "Great Kingdom"

Authors

  • Nazarova Dildora Ilhomovna Doctor of Philology, Bukhara State Medical Institute

Keywords:

Great Kingdom

Abstract

In order to justify the fact that Amir Temur always followed what he said, the writer begins his work with an image of consultation. In 771 (1370) Hijri, on the eve of Nawrozi, Amir Temur stopped with his army in a region called Bonè near Balkh. The host had a serious reason for going on a trip to Balkh. Fifteen days ago, influential emirs of the country gathered at the Temurbek square in Kesh (Shahrisabz). These were Amir Musa, Amir Sayfiddin Neko'z, Amir Davud Duglat, Amir Joku Barlos, Amir Muayd Arlot. Temur hardly speaks at the meeting. He listens to other emirs' opinions about Amir Husain. At the same time, he compares these considerations with each other. It separates and sorts the truth from the false, the sincere opinion from the insincere. It finally comes to a definite stop, a conclusion. In this episode, the main character's words and internal monologue are given a lot of space: "Temurbek opened his mouth a lot, and said: "In order to prove the priority of our commitment to loyalty, Husaynbek will undoubtedly say something about that name and will not hide what is in his heart, because the opening of the secret of the heart is for the purity of the heart. is a pledge". Because he observes the given opinion first, and then tries to give a suitable opinion. Therefore, the internal monologue also serves as an artistic detail that reveals the character of Amir Temur.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-18

How to Cite

Ilhomovna, N. D. . (2023). Ideological-Artistic Content and Compositional Characteristics of the Work "Great Kingdom". Scholastic: Journal of Natural and Medical Education, 2(4), 100–104. Retrieved from https://journal.univerpublishing.org/index.php/scholastic/article/view/1115